Amlogic A311D vs Rockchip RK3399 – Benchmarks Just based on the specifications (4x A73 + 2x A53 against 2x A72 + 4x A53), the Amlogic should be faster, but to find out just how much we’ve run some benchmarks. It’s a little early to test AI acceleration on A311D however, as the SDK will only be ready at the end of August.
No, but RK3399Pro model has a 3.0 TOPS NPUĭolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, and PRIME HDRĬontrary to Amlogic A311D/S922X-B, Rockchip RK3399 is not a TV box SoC, so the Amlogic processor will have better multi-media functions such as HDR (High-Dynamic Range) support, and overall better audio support & video playback compared to the Rockchip processor.Īmlogic A311D also comes with a 5.0 TOPS NPU (Neural-network Processing Unit), while RK3399 does not have one, but Rockchip does have an alternative with Rockchip RK3399Pro equipped with a 3.0 TOPS NPU. Amlogic A311D vs Rockchip RK3399 – Key features The results for A311D should be the same as for Amlogic S922X-B processor, so this post could also serve as an Amlogic S922X-B vs RK3399 comparison.
#Pcmark 10 uninstall android#
To do so, I’ve compared Antutu 7.x, PCMark 10 Work 2.0, and 3Dmark benchmark results in Khadas VIM3 board running Android 9, against an actively-cooled Rockchip RK3399 SBC running Android 8.1. But let’s see how it compares to another hexa-core processor, namely the popular Rockchip RK3399 Cortex-A72/A53 processor released in 2016 and found in several Chromebooks, TV boxes, and development boards. The board is powered by the latest Amlogic A311D hexa-core Cortex-A73/A53 processor, and I’ve found results to be impressive. I’ve run some benchmarks on Khadas VIM3 SBC earlier this morning.